Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR630 14
Original file (NR630 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

BC
Docket No: 00630-14
23 June 2014

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL OF RECORD OF FORMER (ay

Ref: {a} 10 U.S.C. 1552

-Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments .
(2) Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1)
with this Board requesting, in effect, that his RE-30 (orders

refusal) reentry code, issued on 28 December 2013, be changed.

2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. Tew, and Ms.
White-Olson, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 18 June 2014, and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the partial corrective action indicated below
should be taken on the available evidence of record.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
finds as follows:

a. Petitioner entered the Marine Corps on 25 October 2004.
Between 18 January 2008 and 14 April 2009, he received seven
counseling page 11 entries (Administrative Remarks). On 23
March 2012, he requested to have his orders cancelled which was
approved and, on his final evaluation, he was recommended for
retention, however, he was assigned an RE-30 reentry code upon >
his separation. The organization could have assigned an RE-3C
(when directed by CMC or when not eligible and disqualifying
factor is not covered by any other code) reentry code on 28
December 2013.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of ail the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that Petitioner’s request warrants favorable
action.

The Board concludes that based upon his overall record of
service, that relief in the form of changing his RE-30 to an RE-
3C is warranted. 3

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected.to show that
he received an RE-3C vice an RE-30 reentry code on 28 December
2013.

b., That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board’s recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner’s record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.

ec. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner’s naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner's naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6{c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6{c) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete récord of the Board’s
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BRIAN J. GEORGE
Recorder — Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6 (e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0081 14

    Original file (NR0081 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Tew, and Ms. White-Olson, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18 June 2014, and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he received an RE-3P vice an RE-3C reentry code on 14 July 1986. b. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR408 14

    Original file (NR408 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reentry code, issued on 7 March 2013, be changed. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Boyd, and Ms. Countryman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 25 June 2014, and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4107-13

    Original file (NR4107-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 BIG Docket No: 4107-13 19 March 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ‘ Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 04467 12

    Original file (04467 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    As shown in enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) has directed removing the contested fitness report. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Spain, Storz and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 October 2012, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing all...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR409 14

    Original file (NR409 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his RE-4 {not recommended for retention) reentry code, issued on 28 December 2005, be changed. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Boyd, and Ms. Countryman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 25 June 2014, and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR0593 13

    Original file (NR0593 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 to 29% April 2011 (copy at Tab A), removing the service record page 1i (*Administrative Remarks (1070)") entries dated 1 December 2010 and 10 May 2011 (copies at Tab 3) and changing his reenlistment code from RE-3C (Commandant of the Marine Corps...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6862 13

    Original file (NR6862 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, to change his reentry code of RE-4 (not recommended for retention). The Board, consisting of Ms. Henkel and Messrs. Rothlein and Zsalman, reviewed allegations of error and injustice on 23 July 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that relief should be granted. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5171 13

    Original file (NR5171 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a. former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1), with., this Board requesting, in effect, that his separdtion. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval” records, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. He was so discharged on 21 September 1992, c. Reference (b) sets forth the Department of the Navy's policies, standards, and procedures for administratively separating...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1936 14

    Original file (NR1936 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TAL Docket No: 1936-14 9 July 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Les Secretary of the Navy Sub]: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF (i USN, aN Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his narrative reason for separation...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9167 13

    Original file (NR9167 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his RE-4 (not recommended for reenlistment) reentry code, issued on 6 July 2006, be changed. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as follows: a. Petitioner entered the Marine Corps on 22 June 1998. The Board concludes that based upon him being...